Skip Navigation
The University of Texas at Austin
 
 
 

Clustered or random? A best paper award


An initiative paper will receive the AAPG Petroleum Structure & Geomechanics Division Best Recent Paper Award at the 2019 ACE meeting in San Antonio in May.

The paper, Correlation analysis of fracture arrangement in space by Randy Marrett, Julia Gale, Leonel Gomez and Steve Laubach was published in the March 2018 issue of Journal of Structural Geology.

Correlation analysis of fracture arrangement in space makes the case that opening-mode fracture or fault spacings cannot be effectively characterized using traditional statistical techniques because most ignore the sequence of fracture spacings and therefore are not designed to study spatial arrangement. For instance, datasets with different spatial arrangements can have identical statistics of spacing, such as average or median.

Marrett

The paper is based on Randy Marrett’s inspiration. The topic of spatial arrangement and the new approach to unraveling it was also central to Leonel Gomez’s UT dissertation research. Randy’s brilliance was to combine the recognition of the importance of sequence with his capacity to invent a technique, Normalized Correlation Count (NCC), that overcomes the limitations of previous approaches while providing a quantitative comparison against random. No longer should one say this 1D fracture dataset looks random. We can be more quantitative and say whether or not data plot within statistical limits for random.

This paper was a long time in gestation. The inspiration came on a trip to describe core in Ciudad del Carmen in June 2000, and the concept of Normalized Correlation Count and a manuscript were already in hand by March 2001. By 2004 an early version of the code was already being used to establish most of the different types of spatial arrangements reported in the paper, some of which cannot be intuitively discerned. And as some in the community will know, through informal sharing with students and colleagues, the creative ideas in this paper began influencing thinking about fracture spacing long before formal publication. Although we cannot recommend this pace for getting a paper out, the paper, as published, benefited from much careful thought and transformative improvements in the software.

Marrett’s brilliance is combined with idiosyncrasies. For him, publication was only warranted if NCC had software that was user-friendly, standalone, interactive, free-to-download, and suitable for both Mac and Windows. Now you can understand why it took 15+ years to publish.

The paper and software, CorrCount, are both published open access. Since the technique was invented, we have used the time to explore possible uses of NCC and to learn the nuances of interpreting NCC plots. For instance, we have documented a range of spatial arrangement patterns in outcrop and subsurface fracture data, including some described in companion papers in the special issue of the journal in which this paper appeared (some of which are listed below).

The implications for better understanding of fracture processes generally are substantial. We think the paper and associated software will have a long life contributing to practical and fundamental progress in petroleum structure and geomechanics.

Increased spanning potential correlates with fracture clustering, Cretaceous Frontier Formation sandstone (after Li et al. 2018 using normalized correlation count method of Marrett et al. 2018). Spanning potential: Lander and Laubach, 2015 (insets). (a, b) Low spanning potential; clustering indistinguishable from random; (c, d) High spanning potential; hierarchical clustering.

One example of the use of the technique is illustrated here. The figure is modified from John Li et al.’s 2018 Journal of Structural Geology paper that shows evidence of mechanical impact of cement on spatial arrangement. The diagram compares fractures in Cretaceous Frontier Formation sandstone sharing ENE strike but differing burial conditions and degrees of quartz cement spanning potential. Here clustering is quantified using Marrett et al.’s normalized correlation count method. The insets illustrate the contrast in degree of cement spanning fractures at the localities (the diagrams are quartz rinds and quartz bridges from Lander & Laubach 2015). Shaded areas of curves show statistically significant values.

In the first row, (a) shows normalized fracture intensity variation and (b) shows normalized correlation count for spatial arrangements. The diagrams show values are within a 95% confidence envelope, so patterns are indistinguishable from random. This pattern is from outcrop, where cool temperature histories during fracture led to low spanning potential, and little mechanical interaction between quartz cement bonds and fracture opening.

In the second row, (c) shows normalized fracture intensity variation and (d) normalized correlation count. Patterns exceed the 95% confidence envelope. An interpretation of the pattern based on Marrett et al. is that the patterns reflect regularly spaced fractal clusters. For these patterns, from deep cored wells, high spanning potential led to significant mechanical interaction between spanning quartz cement deposits in fracture opening.

Our response to the award nomination thanked our industry colleagues—many of whom are part of the Division—and we repeat that thanks here. Our industry partners have been unstinting with advice, guidance, support, and comradeship in the quest to conquer the challenge of reservoir fractures. We hope they find CorrCount software an unevenly spaced step or three in the right direction.

The paper is published open access and the CorrCount software is available via the link:

Marrett, R., Gale, J.F.W., Gomez, L., and Laubach, S.E., 2018. Correlation analysis of fracture arrangement in space. Journal of Structural Geology 108, 16-33. doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.06.012 | view at publisher  | Go to CorrCount Software

Some other recent papers that use or discuss the CorrCount software include:

  • Laubach, S.E., Lamarche, J., Gauthier, B.D.M., Dunne, W.M., and Sanderson, D.J., 2018. Spatial arrangement of faults and opening-mode fractures. Journal of Structural Geology 108, 2-15. doi.org.10.1016/j.jsg.2017.08.008 | view at publisher
  • Li, J.Z., Laubach, S.E., Gale, J.F.W., and Marrett, R., 2018. Quantifying opening-mode fracture spatial organization in horizontal wellbore image logs, core and outcrop: application to Upper Cretaceous Frontier Formation tight gas sandstones, USA. Journal of Structural Geology 108, 137-156. doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.07.005 | view at publisher
  • Laubach, S.E., Hundley, T.H., Hooker, J.N., Marrett, R., 2018. Spatial arrangement and size distribution of normal faults, Buckskin Detachment upper plate, Western Arizona. Journal of Structural Geology 108, 230-242. doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.10.001 | view at publisher
  • Gale, J.F.W., Ukar, E., Laubach, S.E., 2018. Gaps in DFN models and how to fill them. In: 2nd International Discrete Fracture Network Engineering Conference held in Seattle, Washington, USA, 20–22 June 2018, ARMA, American Rock Mechanics Association. DFNE 18-857 | view at publisher
  • Gale, J.F.W., Elliott, S.J., Li, J.Z., and Laubach, S.E., 2019. Natural fracture characterization in the Wolfcamp Formation at the Hydraulic Fracture Test Site (HFTS), Midland basin, Texas. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, URTEC-644. doi: 10.15530/urtec-2019-644 | view at publisher
  • Wang, Q., Laubach, S.E., Gale, J.F.W., and Ramos, M.J., 2019. Quantified fracture (joint) clustering in Archean basement, Wyoming: application of Normalized Correlation Count method. Petroleum Geoscience. doi:10.1144/petgeo2018-146 | view at publisher

Acknowledgements

Our research on the structural diagenesis of fractures is supported by Grant DE-FG02-03ER15430 from Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.


UT Main  |  UT Directory  |  UT Direct  |  Canvas  |  Privacy Policy  |  Accessibility
© 2020 Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin
Site Last Modified: December 16, 2019